🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."